Friday, August 24, 2012

Setting the Record Straight (Part 1)


NOTE: We have moved to our new home, http://bibleexpose.org/.

The person who tells one side of a story seems right, until someone else comes and asks questions.” (Proverbs 18:17, NCV)
Fresco in the Sistine Salon at Vatican depicting the First Council of Nicaea (From Wikipedia)
Depending on which side of the story you are reading, either the First Council of Nicea (Nicaea) in A.D. 325 was a decisive moment in church history or a disastrous one.

This is the age that formulated the doctrine [of the Trinity.] ... Thus, there [in the first imperial synod] emerged that Nicene Creed, which to this day is the standard of orthodoxy in the Roman, Eastern, Anglican, and some other churches… [1] 

However, as far as the Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) is concerned, it was a disaster.

The Council of Nicaea did not decisively put an end to the arguments and conflicts on the issue concerning the nature of Christ. It turned out to be just the beginning of a more heated controversy on the dogma. … [It] generated more problems than it intended to solve. The years following its decision were marred by more christological and theological controversies...[2] 

For the INC, it was a conspiracy hatched by an emperor bent on his political agenda. It took its readers “a trip down memory lane in the history of the Church”[3] supposedly to enlighten them. 

In spite of the objections to the Christ-is-God doctrine, how did this become pervasive in “Christendom”? What circumstances gave rise to its teaching? How long did it take for this doctrine to be declared by the Church as official? … The controversy [about the deity of Christ] became so grave, the unity of the empire and that of the Church was threatened. This prompted no less than [Constantine] the Roman Emperor to intervene. He attempted to resolve the conflict by convening a council of bishops.[4] 

The INC gave the impression that it was the Council of Nicea that “gave rise to” the doctrine of the deity of our Lord Jesus Christ, made it “pervasive” and to be declared by the Church as official”. They even asserted, “This doctrine was formulated not because of biblical merits but because of the whims of the emperor”.[5]

Proverbs 18:17 tells us, “The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.” (ESV) When the INC stated its case against the Council, it seemed right. However, by examining the claims of the INC, while this series of articles is not an exhaustive work, it seeks to set the record straight about this crucial, historic event. 

(To read the next article, click: Setting the Record Straight Part 2

© 2012 Bible Exposé Apologetics Ministry. To know more about us, click here.

NOTE: We have moved to our new home, http://bibleexpose.org/.

________________________________

[1] Bruce L. Shelley, Church History in Plain Language 2nd Edition (TN: Nelson, 1982; reprint, 1995), 99, 102.

[2] Ruben D. Aromin, “Just when was Christ made God?” Pasugo: God’s Message, July 1994, 16.

[3] Ibid, 14.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid, 16.